A recent legal petition from twelve health advocacy and farm worker coalitions is calling for the EPA to discontinue allowing the spraying of antimicrobial agents on edible plants across the US, pointing to antibiotic-resistant spread and illnesses to farm laborers.
The crop production sprays about substantial volumes of antibiotic and antifungal pesticides on American plants every year, with a number of these agents prohibited in international markets.
“Each year US citizens are at increased threat from dangerous bacteria and illnesses because medical antibiotics are sprayed on produce,” stated Nathan Donley.
The excessive use of antimicrobial drugs, which are vital for addressing infections, as crop treatments on fruits and vegetables threatens public health because it can lead to superbug bacteria. Similarly, excessive application of antifungal agent pesticides can cause fungal infections that are less treatable with currently available pharmaceuticals.
Furthermore, ingesting chemical remnants on crops can alter the intestinal flora and raise the risk of long-term illnesses. These substances also pollute water sources, and are considered to damage bees. Typically low-income and Latino field workers are most at risk.
Growers use antimicrobials because they destroy pathogens that can damage or kill crops. Among the most common antimicrobial treatments is a common antibiotic, which is frequently used in healthcare. Data indicate as much as 125,000 pounds have been sprayed on domestic plants in a annual period.
The petition comes as the regulator encounters urging to expand the application of medical antimicrobials. The bacterial citrus greening disease, carried by the Asian citrus psyllid, is severely affecting fruit farms in southeastern US.
“I appreciate their urgent need because they’re in difficult circumstances, but from a public health point of view this is definitely a obvious choice – it must not occur,” Donley commented. “The bottom line is the enormous challenges caused by spraying medical drugs on produce far outweigh the farming challenges.”
Advocates propose simple farming measures that should be implemented first, such as increasing plant spacing, developing more robust strains of plants and detecting infected plants and promptly eliminating them to halt the diseases from transmitting.
The legal appeal allows the regulator about five years to answer. Several years ago, the agency banned a pesticide in reaction to a similar legal petition, but a legal authority overturned the agency's prohibition.
The regulator can implement a restriction, or has to give a justification why it will not. If the Environmental Protection Agency, or a subsequent government, does not act, then the groups can file a lawsuit. The process could take many years.
“We are engaged in the long game,” Donley concluded.